B.Arch. 2008
“Where you can be . . . is where you need to be.”
-Professor John Zissovici
To me, this quote defines my experience in the Cornell architecture program. One of the most interesting things to me about a design education is that it is so subjective that it cannot be taught in a traditional fashion. The structure of most classes, especially design studios, is lack of structure. Deadlines are often flexible and with highly unrealistic goals. Design is a continuous process and never a complete one, which can be both frustrating and rewarding. Although one may never feel closure with a project, you can simultaneously accomplish a huge amount of work for the given period of time. Besides providing a student with "design sense," an education in this program also successfully gives the “know-how and the elbow grease," for the "real world."
Because of the flexible nature and subjective measurement of progress, a student must learn self motivation, self regulation, and self discipline. There is an amazing work ethic among the students in the program that surpasses any other I have ever seen. If there were a world record category for the most all-nighters pulled by a single group of people over the course of five years, it would most certainly belong to the students of Cornell architecture.
Most professors focus on criticizing design and rarely comment on progress or lack thereof. This approach to pedagogy is fun because it allows the student to control their education. No student shares the same experience in this program, and, in my opinion, the approach to education Cornell architecture takes has the potential to provide a solid base that allows self-motivated students to develop into talented, professional designers rather than a group of “CAD monkeys” cut from the same mold.